7 − = six


 
You must be logged in to post Login Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Minimum search word length is 4 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Cross contamination of latent prints and DNA:

No Tags
UserPost

6:19 am
December 11, 2011


Daniel Bandi

New Member

posts 2

We commonly use a conventional fiberglass type brush and conventional fingerprinting powders to develop latent prints.  The question has arisen if the same brush is used from crime scene to crime scene can this potentially deposit DNA from one scene to another?  I am looking for any studies I can be pointed to that indicate the potential for cross contamination of DNA from using the same latent print brush and / or powder.  Thanks!

10:45 am
December 12, 2011


Karen Green

Member

posts 6

Daniel

Here is an article in Volume 50 Issue 6 of the Journal of Forensic Sciences.  I haven't read beyond the abstract, but here's a link:  http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LI…..004430.htm

As a DNA scientist and crime scene investigator I understand that while encouraged, it is not always practical to use disposable brushes.  At a minimum I recommend aliquoting the fingerprint powder into a smaller container (to be disposed of at the end of the scene.)    

Karen

12:07 pm
December 12, 2011


Daniel Bandi

New Member

posts 2

Karen,

 

Thank you.  It certainly reinforces how I have been trained.  Take Care.

12:28 pm
December 12, 2011


TAdair

Member

posts 5

I think it's pretty much a non-starter issue. Get in the practice of taking your DNA samples (swabbings) prior to powdering and you'll be fine. Tom A.

2:25 pm
December 12, 2011


Karen Green

Member

posts 6

I certainly try to collect DNA samples prior to the introduction of any outside reagents but often that is not possible when collecting touch DNA samples.  Certain areas may have to be processed for prints first to make sure I’m not destroying anything while collecting my DNA swabs.  I may also collect DNA swabs from areas that show ridge detail after processing but are insufficient for comparison.              

8:14 am
December 22, 2011


EToomer

New Member

posts 2

In our agency, we have gone completely to disposable brushes and powders. We still use fiberglass brushes, since they are better than the "off the shelf" disposable brushes, but we throw them away after a single use. Additionally, our lab (USACIL) has had luck getting both Touch DNA and latent print results from lifts using traditional fingerprint collection methods.

No Tags

About the ACSR Forum

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 8

Currently Online:
5 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3
Forums: 11
Topics: 69
Posts: 87

Membership:

There are 187 Members
There has been 1 Guest

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

CS DeFrance – 6
Karen Green – 6
TAdair – 5
MNoedel – 4
EToomer – 2
360recon – 2

Recent New Members: Shawislander, nelsonsp123, kathanas, John Gaziano, melissa703, niesul14

Administrators: Webmaster (62 Posts), admin (4 Posts)